Skip to main content

Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP)

Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) become mandatory for implementation from 1st January, 2013.

A SEEMP provides a possible approach for monitoring ship and fleet efficiency performance over time and some options to be considered when seeking to optimize the performance of the ship.


The purpose of a SEEMP is to establish a mechanism for a company and/or a ship to improve the energy efficiency of a ship's operation. Preferably, the ship-specific SEEMP is linked to a broader corporate energy management policy for the company that owns, operates or controls the ship, recognizing that no two shipping companies are the same, and that ships operate under a wide range of different conditions.

The SEEMP should be developed as a ship-specific plan by the company.

The SEEMP seeks to improve a ship's energy efficiency through four steps:
  1. Planning
  2. Implementation
  3. Monitoring 
  4. Self-evaluation and improvement.




Structure of SEEMP


Planning
  • Planning is the most crucial stage of the SEEMP
  •  it primarily determines both the current status of ship energy usage and the expected improvement of ship energy efficiency.
  • Therefore, it is encouraged to devote sufficient time to planning so that the most appropriate, effective and implementable plan can be developed.


 Implementation
  • After a ship and a company identify the measures to be implemented,
  •  it is essential to establish a system for implementation of the identified and selected measures by developing the procedures for energy management, by defining tasks and by assigning them to qualified personnel.
  •  the SEEMP should describe how each measure should be implemented and who the responsible person(s) is. 
  • The implementation period (start and end dates) of each selected measure should be indicated.
  • The development of such a system can be considered as a part of planning, and therefore may be completed at the planning stage.
  • The planned measures should be carried out in accordance with the predetermined implementation system. 
  • Record-keeping for the implementation of each measure is beneficial for self-evaluation at a later stage and should be encouraged.
  • If any identified measure cannot be implemented for any reason(s), the reason(s) should be recorded for internal use


Monitoring
  • The energy efficiency of a ship should be monitored quantitatively.
  • This should be done by an established method, preferably by an international standard.
  • The EEOI developed by the Organization is one of the internationally established tools to obtain a quantitative indicator of energy efficiency of a ship and/or fleet in operation, and can be used for this purpose. Therefore, EEOI could be considered as the primary monitoring tool, although other quantitative measures also may be appropriate.
  •  If used, it is recommended that the EEOI is calculated in accordance with the Guidelines developed by the Organization (MEPC.1/Circ.684), adjusted, as necessary, to a specific ship and trade.
  •  In addition to the EEOI, if convenient and/or beneficial for a ship or a company, other measurement tools can be utilized. In the case where other monitoring tools are used, the concept of the tool and the method of monitoring may be determined at the planning stage.

  • It should be noted that whatever measurement tools are used, continuous and consistent data collection is the foundation of monitoring.
  •  To allow for meaningful and consistent monitoring, the monitoring system, including the procedures for collecting data and the assignment of responsible personnel, should be developed.

  • It should be noted that, in order to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens on ships' staff, monitoring should be carried out as far as possible by shore staff, utilizing data obtained from existing required records such as the official and engineering log-books and oil record books, etc. Additional data could be obtained as appropriate.
  • Search and Rescue:When a ship diverts from its scheduled passage to engage in search and rescue operations, it is recommended that data obtained during such operations is not used in ship energy efficiency monitoring, and that such data may be recorded separately.



Self-evaluation and improvement
  • Self-evaluation and improvement is the final phase of the management cycle.
  • This phase should produce meaningful feedback for the coming first stage, i.e. planning stage of the next improvement cycle.
  • The purpose of self-evaluation is to evaluate the effectiveness of the planned measures and of their implementation, to deepen the understanding on the overall characteristics of the ship's operation such as what types of measures can/cannot function effectively, and how and/or why, to comprehend the trend of the efficiency improvement of that ship and to develop the improved SEEMP for the next cycle.
  •  For this process, procedures for self-evaluation of ship energy management should be developed. Furthermore, self-evaluation should be implemented periodically by using data collected through monitoring. 
  • it is recommended to invest time in identifying the cause-and-effect of the performance during the evaluated period for improving the next stage of the management plan.


SEEMP sample form generally to be used or you can use similar to it as provide by your company, it’s not a mandatory format but it should cover all the aspects of form


Methods of energy improvements with SEEMP


Category

Improvement method

Description

Fuel Efficient Operations

Improved voyage planning

Careful planning and execution of voyages
Weather routeing

Potential efficiency savings using routeing tools from existing providers.
Just in time

Optimise speed based on early communication with next port on berth availability
Speed optimisation

To minimise fuel consumption, taking into account engine manufacturers optimal settings and arrival times/availability of berths at port.
Optimised shaft power

Efficiency can be improved by setting constant RPM.
Optimised Ship Handling

Optimum trim

Operating at optimum trim for specified draft and speed.
Optimum ballast

Ballasting for optimum trim and steering conditions.
Optimum propeller and propeller inflow considerations

Possible retrofitting of improved propeller designs and/or inflow modifiers such as fins or ducts in order to improve efficiency.
Optimum use of rudder and heading control systems (autopilots)

Reducing distance sailed ‘off track’ and minimising losses caused by rudder corrections. Possible improvements through retrofitting optimised rudder designs.
Hull Maintenance



Use of advanced coating systems, better management of cleaning intervals and underwater inspection
Propulsion System

Propulsion system maintenance

Systematic minimisation of heat and mechanical loss through routine maintenance and optimisation.
Waste Heat Recovery


Thermal heat loss from exhaust gases to generate electricity or propulsion via shaft motors.
Improved Fleet Management


Better utilisation of fleet capacity and use of ‘best practise
Improved Cargo Handling


Cargo handling matched to ship and port requirements
Energy Management


Review of energy usage such as electrical and HVAC systems.
Fuel Type


Potential use of emerging alternative fuels.
Other Measures


Computer software to calculate fuel consumption; use of renewable energy technology; use of shore power.

Comments

  1. These turbines are very low-budget to perform in phrases of gasoline intake and protection.Shipping from china

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good blog about energy management and planing I am also doing my
    PGCM course in energy management from
    distance learning center in Pune, the info shared by you is very useful for me. keep sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wonderful blog! keep sharing articles like this very informative and excellent content with it, once again thanks for sharing this valuable blog. Looking forsoftware development center in chennai.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Load Line & Why it is Important

Merchant ships have a marking on their hull know as the Plimsoll line or the Plimsoll mark, which indicates the limit until which ships can be loaded with enough cargo, internationally, the Plimsoll line on a ship is officially referred to as the international load line. Every type of ship has a different level of floating and the Plimsoll line on a ship generally varies from one vessel to another.  All vessels of 24 meters and more are required to have this Load line marking at the centre position of the length of summer load water line. There are two types of Load line markings:- Standard Load Line marking – This is applicable to all types of vessels. Timber Load Line Markings – This is applicable to vessels carrying timber cargo. These marks shall be punched on the surface of the hull making it visible even if the ship side paint fades out. The marks shall again be painted with white or yellow colour on a dark background/black on a light background.  The comp

Difference Between A, B & C-Class Divisions?

IMO Symbol A Class Division  IMO Symbol B Class Division  SOLAS has tables for structural fire protection requirement of bulkheads and decks. The requirements depend on the spaces in question and are different for passenger ships and cargo ships. The Administration has required a test of a prototype bulkhead or deck in accordance with the Fire Test Procedures Code to ensure that it meets the above requirements for integrity and temperature rise. Types of Divisions: "A" Class "B" Class "C" Class "A" Class: "A" class divisions are those divisions formed by bulkheads and decks which comply with the following criteria: They are constructed of steel or equivalent material They are suitably stiffened They are constructed as to be capable of preventing the passage of smoke and flame to the end of the one-hour standard fire test. they are insulated with approved non-combustible materials such that the average tempera

Pump Shaft Alignment Procedure

Types of shaft alignment methods: Visual Line-Up Straightedge/Feeler Gauge Rim and Face Cross Dial Reverse Dial Laser Visual Line-Up The visual line-up method is the most common method of alignment. Used in initial installations, visual line-up allows technicians to analyze the working conditions and feasibility of installation. Straightedge/Feeler Gauge Straightedges are used to determine the offset between coupling halves. Corrections are made under all four of the machines feet. Feeler gauges or taper gauges measure the gap between coupling halves at the bottom and top of the coupling. Rim and Face This method is similar in principle to using a straightedge and feeler gauge, but more accurate since dial indicators are used. The rim reading measures the offset between the coupling halves. The face reading measures the angular difference between the faces of the coupling. Changes are calculated with the same formula as the straightedge/feeler gauge met